hI, On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:05 AM Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Here's my earlier take on this: > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/108668/
Nice. Was there push back? Why didn't it go in? > execpt I went further and moved the flush past the unlock in the end. Is that necessary? I was wondering about that but there's this comment in the code: * ... Locks, especially struct * &drm_modeset_lock, should not be held in worker threads or any other * asynchronous context used to commit the hardware state. So it made me think there would be no locks held, and then I threw a scratch build at someone who reported it didn't deadlock and solved their issue. --Ray
