On Thu, 2026-02-26 at 12:42 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 26/02/2026 10:56, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> 
> 

[…]

> > > >         {}
> > > >    };
> > > >    static struct kunit_suite drm_sched_priority = {
> > > >         .name = "drm_sched_basic_priority_tests",
> > > > @@ -544,11 +544,11 @@ static void drm_sched_test_credits(struct kunit 
> > > > *test)
> > > >         drm_mock_sched_entity_free(entity);
> > > >         drm_mock_sched_fini(sched);
> > > >    }
> > > >    static struct kunit_case drm_sched_credits_tests[] = {
> > > > -       KUNIT_CASE(drm_sched_test_credits),
> > > > +       KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(drm_sched_test_credits),
> > > 
> > > Same really.
> > > 
> > > Anyway, the scheduler parts LGTM and I can follow up trying to optimise
> > > these two later.
> > > 
> > > For the scheduler:
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Thanks!
> 
> I have a patch already which makes those (and one more) test cases 
> faster, but I will wait sending it until you merge this one.

And why would we want to flag a test as slow just to immediately
afterwards make it faster?

Would it not be wiser to drop Maxime's change?


P.

Reply via email to