On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 03:36:24AM +0100, Raag Jadav wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 03:11:58PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > > On 3/23/26 15:10, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 08:56:58AM +0100, Raag Jadav wrote: > > >> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 06:36:46PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > >>> Currently 'none' recovery method for wedged event expects no explicit > > >>> recovery from userspace consumer but it expects driver to have reset > > >>> the device, which may not always be the case. Update documentation and > > >>> log to reflect this expectation. > > >> > > >> Anything I can do to move this forward? > > > > Invent some tech to clone certain people so that we have more reviewers. > > If this allows my clones to also review my patches, I fully support this :) > > > > Ping. > > > > I will take a look now. > > Thank you, I think it's safe to land through drm-misc (if anyone has access).
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> But it is not applying cleanly on drm-misc-next. drm-misc maintainers, could you please do a backmerge of drm-next? Or ack these patches to go through drm-xe-next > > Raag > > > >>> v2: Rephrase documentation (Rodrigo) > > >>> > > >>> Raag Jadav (3): > > >>> drm/doc: Update documentation for 'none' recovery method > > >>> drm: Update log for 'none' recovery method > > >>> drm/xe: Send 'none' recovery method for > > >>> XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG_NO_RESET > > >>> > > >>> Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 14 +++++++------- > > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 2 +- > > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 9 ++++++++- > > >>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> 2.43.0 > > >>> > >
