On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 09:52:07AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 03:36:24AM +0100, Raag Jadav wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 03:11:58PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > > > On 3/23/26 15:10, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 08:56:58AM +0100, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 06:36:46PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > >>> Currently 'none' recovery method for wedged event expects no explicit > > > >>> recovery from userspace consumer but it expects driver to have reset > > > >>> the device, which may not always be the case. Update documentation and > > > >>> log to reflect this expectation. > > > >> > > > >> Anything I can do to move this forward? > > > > > > Invent some tech to clone certain people so that we have more reviewers. > > > > If this allows my clones to also review my patches, I fully support this :) > > > > > > Ping. > > > > > > I will take a look now. > > > > Thank you, I think it's safe to land through drm-misc (if anyone has > > access). > > Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> > > But it is not applying cleanly on drm-misc-next. > > drm-misc maintainers, could you please do a backmerge of drm-next? > > Or ack these patches to go through drm-xe-next
It's already on misc thanks to Brost. Thank you all for the support. Raag > > > >>> v2: Rephrase documentation (Rodrigo) > > > >>> > > > >>> Raag Jadav (3): > > > >>> drm/doc: Update documentation for 'none' recovery method > > > >>> drm: Update log for 'none' recovery method > > > >>> drm/xe: Send 'none' recovery method for > > > >>> XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG_NO_RESET > > > >>> > > > >>> Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 14 +++++++------- > > > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 2 +- > > > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 9 ++++++++- > > > >>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> 2.43.0 > > > >>> > > >
