On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 16:24, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
> > As far as I know this is not so simple as a X server and libs. You also
> > have the kernel modules... and those are tied to the kernel version &
> > configuration you have.
> AFAIR there is a way to build kernel modules without precise kernel
> version dependance (correct me if I am wrong) - as long as all external
> symbols as resolved, the module will be loaded.
> 

I don't know much about that.. Anyway I think that the best option is to
use a share on a computer with a enough hard disk space. See below.

> > If the problem you have is hard disk space (you need about 500 Mb) you
> > could try to build on a remote machine disk, mounted via samba or nfs.
> :) If I only had this machine:) There are only 2 machines in the company
> with Linux: my laptop and server. Nobody is going to let me build
> something on the server (and it does make sense:).
> 

You don't need a Linux machine. AFAIK, a plain samba mount (i.e., a
Windows share in Linux world) should be ok. If you still have problems
with symbolic links just change the 'ln -s' to 'cp' and you should be
fine. Unless you tell me I also don't have access to a Windows computer
with 500 Mb free.. :)

> > If the problem is slow/expensive internet connection I think that I it
> > would be no problem if I hosted a bzipped tarball of the mach64 branch
> > snapshot.
> In sources? :( I am not sure it will help me (see above). BTW, what
> would be the size of the archive (because traffic is an issue for me)?
> 

I'm not sure. I think that about 20Mb... for the sources. (I don't have
my laptop with me so I can't give precise figures. Anyway just give a
look in the size of XFree 4.1.0 source and binaries rpms to get a good
ideia.)


> So, the question is: whether there is a way to build kernel modules for
> "generic" 2.4.x? Will this cause trouble? Also, my second question is
> still remaining: will the server and libs be compatible with XFree 4.1.0
> from RH7.2 distro?
> 

It's possible to build the modules separately. The Redhat for instance
does that in its kernel source.

To answer to your 2nd question: yes. It's exactly the same distribution
I have on my laptop...


> Regards,
> 
> Sergey


Regards,

Jose Fonseca


_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to