Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Vladimir Dergachev scribbled:
> >
> > > <__snipped_>
> > >>
> > >
> > > I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to
> > > please try the latest ati.2 CVS code at http://gatos.sf.net - or just take
> > > a look at it.
> > >
> > > Basically I put in info->accel->Sync(pScrn) at entrance points into Xv
> > > driver. SetupImageVideo, StopVideo, SetPortAttribute, GetPortAttribute and
> > > PutVideo are all "control" calls, perfomance is not critical. PutImage
> > > should, arguably, take more time during image trasfer.. And if you are
> > > playing Quake and watching DVD at the same you are making problems for
> > > yourself anyway ;) (And the faster the card the less noticable any
> >
> > > slowdown from extra Sync calls will be)
> >
> >
> > I've checked this out.
> > Seems that there is a buggaboo in the radeon implementation.
> > I don't know if the same would apply for R128, seems that it
> > might.
> >
> 
> GATOS Radeon driver has the proper handling of memory controller.
> Consequently, usual drm modules will not work - you need to use drm-kernel
> package  available at http://gatos.sf.net/
> 
>                            Vladimir Dergachev

Is there any reason the drivers can't be merged?  

Keith

_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to