Vladimir Dergachev wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, deek wrote: > > > > > > > Vladimir Dergachev scribbled: > > > > > <__snipped_> > > >> > > > > > > I've implemented this (easier than software CCE) scheme. If you want to > > > please try the latest ati.2 CVS code at http://gatos.sf.net - or just take > > > a look at it. > > > > > > Basically I put in info->accel->Sync(pScrn) at entrance points into Xv > > > driver. SetupImageVideo, StopVideo, SetPortAttribute, GetPortAttribute and > > > PutVideo are all "control" calls, perfomance is not critical. PutImage > > > should, arguably, take more time during image trasfer.. And if you are > > > playing Quake and watching DVD at the same you are making problems for > > > yourself anyway ;) (And the faster the card the less noticable any > > > > > slowdown from extra Sync calls will be) > > > > > > I've checked this out. > > Seems that there is a buggaboo in the radeon implementation. > > I don't know if the same would apply for R128, seems that it > > might. > > > > GATOS Radeon driver has the proper handling of memory controller. > Consequently, usual drm modules will not work - you need to use drm-kernel > package available at http://gatos.sf.net/ > > Vladimir Dergachev
Is there any reason the drivers can't be merged? Keith _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel