> > There aren't a great number of dri_users questions anyway and a good=20 > percentage of them probably should be on dri_devel as it stands now (they= > 're=20 > proper bugs, or whatever). > > So, I guess I still think the second list: > - doesn't serve it's intended audience well > - doesn't save us any time (except by making it easier to ignore users). > > But, I don't feel anywhere near as strongly about this as about the=20 > sourceforge bug tracker. I can live with either outcome.
One thing that you might want to explore is closing off dri-devel from the average user and trying to shift a majority of the traffic to dri-users and keep dri-devel strictly on the development side of dri instead of having it double as a help mailing list. Just my $.02. -- John Tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; AOL IM: ogre7929 http://ogre.rocky-road.net http://ogre.rocky-road.net/cdr.shtml _______________________________________________________________ Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
