Hi Pawel, > I think it is much too early for this kind of criticism. While the > updated website is far from perfect and finished, I definetely think it > is a clear improvement with respect to the former version.
I don't see how it is too early for criticism. Liam has indicated several times that he would like to use the site update as is. If it is too early to criticize an apparently finished product, then when should I criticize it? A few other people had already raised the same issues as me even earlier in the game. I am simply trying to provide some _constructive_ criticism as to how the site update can be improved so that it can replace the current site. When I designed the current site it also didn't replace the previous site until all the problems had been adressed. > it is important to get the message out Yes it is important to get the message out and that is what the mailing lists are for. I am pretty sure that anyone how follows dri-devel is aware of the site update. > and I would consider any change > that makes the website more "alive" (+the information can actually be > found on it) a change for good. There are few things more discouraging > that a unmaintained website. That's true and with my email I am trying to get things moving in that direction. If Liam would address the problems I mentioned, then maybe the site would go live soon. > Some guys are trying to do something about > it and IMO definetely deserve a credit for it. I do appreciate Liams effort and I am sure that everyone else does to. However, that doesn't mean I have to accept it as is, one must be allowed to make some constructive critisism. - Frank ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
