On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 20:15:29 +0100 Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2002 19:12 schrieb Felix Kühling: > > Hi all, > > > > could I remind you of the original subject of this thread? ;-) It sounds > > like the discussions about a new configuration tool could go on for a > > while and I am sure going to contribute to that if I can. In the mean > > time, could we just change to 32bpt. In that case my original patch > > would do it :) I hope these two screen shots convince you: > > > > http://www.dd.chalmers.se/~kuhlfeli/noforce32bpt.jpg > > http://www.dd.chalmers.se/~kuhlfeli/force32bpt.jpg > > Would be much better if you've posted the texmem requirements for both > versions. The current status in CVS is: in 24bpp mode you always get 32bpt textures. With a 16bpp and 32bpt textures you need exactly the same amount of texmem but have a smaller frame buffer, back buffer and z-buffer. And I havn't heard anyone complain on dri-devel or dri-users about too little texmem on a 64 or 128 MB graphics card ;-) > > -Dieter > Felix __\|/__ ___ ___ ___ __Tschüß_______\_6 6_/___/__ \___/__ \___/___\___You can do anything,___ _____Felix_______\Ä/\ \_____\ \_____\ \______U___just not everything____ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >o<__/ \___/ \___/ at the same time! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Visual Studio.NET comprehensive development tool, built to increase your productivity. Try a free online hosted session at: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr0003en _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
