On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, D. Hageman wrote: >In all honesty ... I haven't run to any issues with the Mesa 5.x based >stuff. Remember - I also take the time to merge the current DRI code back >into the the XFree86 CVS repository before I build a release. I picked up >a copy of Wolfenstein a week or so back just so I could stress test things >and so far I have had no issues with it. It works great! > >As a side note ... the code that I compile is bundled into RPMS based off >of Mike Harris' devel XFree86 RPMS. I am willing to allow other people to >use them to test code, but .... they need to realize that they shouldn't >bug RedHat or Mike Harris about issues they find in them! Since I am the >only one using them, I usually don't change the name of the packager or >distributer ... I guess if anyone is really interested in these RPMS I >could go back and do that.
Distribution: and Packager: fields are filled in by rpm during building, and default to nothing. If you query your rpm packages that you've built, they should show nothing for those 2 fields unless you've customized the rpm configuration to specify something in those fields. Just thought I'd mention that. My CVS XFree86 RPMs are also always avail at the URL in my sig for updating from, or for those who want to use them. HTH -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
