On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 06:26:44PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > [....] > IMHO, the names of functions and the file they are located in > should be based on the functionality that they are providing, and > should be grouped based on similar functionality and not based on > similarities in portions of their names.
I agree with that sentiment 100%. Which is why when I see the function in question, as providing a DRI-specific function that does not *exist* if DRI is not compiled in, it seems straightforward to me that as such, it should have a DRI-oriented name, and belongs in radeon_dri.c ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
