On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Keith Whitwell wrote: >> With several people in disagreement with you though, I guess it >> might be a decision perhaps that should fall more into the lap of >> the driver maintainer or project lead or somesuch. > >Well, I didn't have much to do with this code when it was written, but I'm >happy for it to stay where it is and as it is named for now. > >If someone wanted to take on a bigger task of comprehensively spring-cleaning >the radeon 2d driver, that might be interesting, but renaming & moving that >one function won't do anything to make the driver easier to navigate.
Agreed. Also, there are IMHO large enough portions of code that are common to both the r128 and radeon driver at least, which could be moved to a common shared file. Unless it's objected to, I'll be investigating something like that in the future. -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
