On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:23:14PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote: > >Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather >than later. > >I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are two >approaches to doing the re-org: > >1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/commit commands to move everything >around. This would work, but it would be pretty tedious and we'd sort >of lose the CVS histories. > >2. Download the nightly CVS tarball to my machine, reorganize it, then > upload it to SourceForge and have the SF admins install it as the >new CVS tree. The one issue with this approach is that it would >effect all CVS branches. A benefit would be the ability to _really_ >remove the old, empty directories. > >I prefer option 2.
Depending on how you do option 2, you'll lose the ability to check out older versions as they used to be. It is possible to do a combination of the two approaches, but that would require quite a bit of work. For example, the old ,v files wouldn't be removed, but rather copied to the new location, and the old tags for the files in the new locations would either be removed or renamed. Another option is to keep the old repository as-is, and start a new one (i.e., a new top level directory under the same $CVSROOT), seeded with the reorganised files from the old one. David -- David Dawes Founder/committer/developer The XFree86 Project www.XFree86.org/~dawes ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
