--- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > don't think Mesa makes any more sense as a home than DRI, since both are > consumers (and the freedesktop.org X Server is now a consumer, too). If
There aren't three consumers: Mesa, xserver and DRI. There is only one, the dri drivers in the Mesa tree. xserver and DRI then use the mesa dri drivers. Also, something has got to give with fbdev vs DRM and registering with the kernel as owner of the hardware. DRM can't continure to run in stealth mode on 2.6. Without registering the video hardware it never appears in /sysfs and /udev. Registering also triggers the hotplug event which I'm using in my new code to reset secondary adapters. > folks are in favor of this, I can work on setting up the repo so that > history is preserved. Would we then leave the DRM in the DRI tree > there, or remove it and have XFree86 merge from two different trees? > > Actually, I'm thinking of just moving the DRM out to a separate module > in the DRI's CVSROOT. > > -- > Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ===== Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
