On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 09:35:38AM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote: > Michel Dänzer wrote: > >On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 02:45, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > >>Would this also be a good time to move the DRM modules into the Mesa tree? > > > > > >Has it even been decided that's a good idea? I'm not sure it is; their > >being separate might help prevent compatibility problems with their > >interface, or at least recognize them quickly. I don't feel strongly > >either way though, just wondering. > > I've got a similar view - the drm may well be better off as a seperate > project with a its own tree.
Doing it this way, we'd need to have regular releases of the DRM kernel modules and tag them with CVS keywords. But I'm all for this too. Alan. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id78&alloc_id371&op=click -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
