On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 04:19, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 07:54, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 01:18:49AM +0200, Michel DÃnzer wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 00:00, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I could merge in XFree86 4.3.99.902 which is before the license change
> > > 
> > > Are you sure? AFAIK David applied the new license (or at least a
> > > similarly controversial one) to some files before it was publicly
> > > announced.
> >  
> > Yes, I'm positive that 4.3.99.902 is unencumbered.
> 
> I'm pretty sure the autoconfig work, under the X-Oz license (nearly
> identical to the problematic one), was in at that point.

Right, that's what I was thinking of.


-- 
Earthling Michel DÃnzer      |     Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast    |   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to