Another request is that this work be compared to the kgi work so that we don't repeat the same mistakes. I wasn't around for that debate, can someone explain what was learned from attempt?
I'll start reworking the proposal to include the feedback I have so far and get it ready for the next round. I suspect the next round on the DRI/FB lists will generate a lot more flames. The graphic driver issue is heating up because MS Longhorn is focusing on accelerated graphics as a major feature. --- Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > why do I get the impression we are discussing kgi or at least the goals of > kgi? without mentioning it ..is kgi a bad word around these parts? :-) > > Dave. > > -- > David Airlie, Software Engineer > http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie > pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software > Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to > deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. > http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 > -- > _______________________________________________ > Dri-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel ===== Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
