El Miércoles, 29 de Septiembre del 2004 3:20 AM, Jon Smirl escribió: > Get the code from here: > cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/dri co drm > and build in the linux-2.6 directory. > > It looks like you are missing drm_sysfs.h which is is the CVS repository. > I'm building mach64 from CVS on my machine without problems on current > linus-bk. > > There files should be in the linux-2.6 directory: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]$ ls > CVS drm_core.h drm_sysfs.h Makefile Makefile.kernel radeon_i2c.c > radeon_i2c.h README > [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]$ > > Only the 2.4 DRM will build from linux directory, you have to use linux-2.6 >
Same problem. Your solution works. Seems that snapshots are taken from the "linux" directory. Somebody should make a workaround to let the users (like me) download a snapshot an install without more complications. > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 03:44:07 +0200, Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am trying to compile the mach64 drm kernel module for kernel > > 2.6.9-rc2-mm4 from latest cvs as the code from the mach64 tree from > > January is regrettably no longer compiling for me, too many changes to > > the drm code in the kernel apparently (mostly problems with drmP.h). > > > > Anyway, I downloaded the latest cvs from freedesktop.org according to > > the instructions on the site (it said something about a move of some of > > the cvs code, but didn't seem related to drm). > > > > When I tried to compile it, it gave the following warnings about missing > > symbols and then the driver won't load for the same reason: > > > > *** Warning: "mach64_sysfs_device_add" > > [/home/micha/dev/dri/new/drm/linux/mach64.ko] undefined! *** Warning: > > "remap_page_range" [/home/micha/dev/dri/new/drm/linux/mach64.ko] > > undefined! *** Warning: "mach64_sysfs_device_remove" > > [/home/micha/dev/dri/new/drm/linux/mach64.ko] undefined! *** Warning: > > "mach64_sysfs_create" [/home/micha/dev/dri/new/drm/linux/mach64.ko] > > undefined! *** Warning: "mach64_sysfs_destroy" > > [/home/micha/dev/dri/new/drm/linux/mach64.ko] undefined! > > > > Is the tree supposed to compile now, which one if so and where am I > > going wrong. If not, is there a tag/date thats known to work that I can > > use (I could really use the little acceleration drm gives me for the > > matlab work I do. Not much 3D, but enough to be intolerable without drm > > support). > > > > Thanks > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
