On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 15:44 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 2:30 PM, Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > >   I both cases, the kernel will need to
> > > know how to activate a given context and the context handle should be
> > > part of the super ioctl arguments.
> >
> > We needn't expose the contexts to user-space, just provide a virtual
> > consistent device and manage contexts in the kernel. We could add the
> > ability to manage contexts from user space for cases where that makes
> > sense (like, perhaps, in the X server where a context per client may be
> > useful).
> 
> Oh, right we don't need one per GLContext, just per DRI client, mesa
> handles switching between GL contexts.  What about multithreaded
> rendering sharing the same drm fd?

That's not supported, every GLX context has its own DRM context.


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer           |          http://tungstengraphics.com
Libre software enthusiast         |          Debian, X and DRI developer


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to