On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:20:06AM +0200, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:58:01AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Granted if these ioctls are to be used by *chrome to workaround this > > bug as well, then > > it would be good if patches to those driver were made available so as > > to get correct > > operation. > > > > Otherwise these patches fail for the usual reasons, they actively > > revert a change made upstream > > (removing linux/types.h and reverting all that), also this should be > > one patch, we don't need .c and .h > > separate all the time, its also impossible to bisect across that sort of > > thing. > > As a first answer, without going in depth, as i just returned from my > thursday constitutional. > > Do you have an explanation as to why this commit never made it to the > kernel? > > > > No version was bumped, because i believe these are against the kernel > > > copy of the drm, because for some reason the kernel copy never saw > > > commit 659e9a091d3. > > And why did you suddenly start to care, while you pretty much ignored > this dead before? Would that be for technical reasons?
Luc, When was the last productive mail you sent? Daniel
pgpj1ycI97zha.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
-- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
