While I also love scala, sintax wise, I think it is now pretty common knowledge 
that it should not be used for high perf applications/large codebases.

There is an epic rant on the subject from coda hale of yammer. Yammer changed 
from being almost all scala to almost all java.
http://eng.yammer.com/blog/2011/11/30/scala-at-yammer.html

I share this sentiment and also think it applies to other languages like groovy 
so like maven I think java is the lesser evil.

-david

On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> 
> 
>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the build system 
>> for drill?
>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
> 
> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it downloads 
> half of the Internet every time). 
> 
> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala + SBT [1]? 
> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;)
> 
> Cheers,
>          Michael
> 
> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/
> 
> --
> Michael Hausenblas
> Ireland, Europe
> http://mhausenblas.info/
> 
> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote:
> 
>> I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the build system 
>> for drill?
>> I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO).
>> I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed.
>> 
>> -david
>> 
>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> I see classes in the source tree:
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen
>>> 
>>> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source code into an
>>> antler source tree.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Still work in progress, but anyway - https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser
>>>> 
>>>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome
>>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to