-1 for maven. On 9/12/12, Constantine Peresypkin <[email protected]> wrote: > If build system is evil it's better to build it manually. > -1 for maven > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the build >> system for drill? >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. >> >> If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it downloads >> half of the Internet every time). >> >> But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala + SBT [1]? >> Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;) >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ >> >> -- >> Michael Hausenblas >> Ireland, Europe >> http://mhausenblas.info/ >> >> On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote: >> >> > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the build >> system for drill? >> > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). >> > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. >> > >> > -david >> > >> > On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> I see classes in the source tree: >> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen >> >> >> >> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source code into an >> >> antler source tree. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov >> >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> >> >>> Still work in progress, but anyway - >> https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser >> >>> >> >>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome >> >>> >> > >> >> >
-- Sent from my mobile device
