If build system is evil it's better to build it manually. -1 for maven On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Michael Hausenblas < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the build > system for drill? > > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). > > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > > If codebase mainly in Java, yeah maven (though it feels like it downloads > half of the Internet every time). > > But not so fast - did we agree on Java, yet? How about Scala + SBT [1]? > Integrates nicely with Java and is soooo much more productive ;) > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://www.scala-sbt.org/ > > -- > Michael Hausenblas > Ireland, Europe > http://mhausenblas.info/ > > On 12 Sep 2012, at 20:47, David Alves wrote: > > > I know that no-one has mentioned this before but what about the build > system for drill? > > I'm personally in favor of maven (lesser evil for java IMO). > > I'd be happy to contribute that setup, if needed. > > > > -david > > > > On Sep 12, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I see classes in the source tree: > >> > >> > https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser/tree/master/src/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen/classes/org/apache/drill/parsers/impl/drqlantlr/autogen > >> > >> Also, I would strongly recommend pulling the antlr source code into an > >> antler source tree. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Camuel Gilyadov > >> <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> Still work in progress, but anyway - > https://github.com/ApacheDrill/parser > >>> > >>> Constructive critique and contributions are welcome > >>> > > > >
