On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 11:36 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:58:35PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote: > > From: Erik Arfvidson <erik.arfvid...@unisys.com> > > > > This patch changes serverdown variable to int instead of bool > > > > Why? It looks like bool is more appropriate?
Hi Dan, We had received some comments on our code that said that our BOOL typedef wasn't acceptable, and that we really ought to be returning 0 for success and error values in failure cases. By switching these to int we're taking a first step towards that. -- Ben Romer | Software Engineer | Virtual Systems Development Unisys Corporation | 2476 Swedesford Rd | Malvern, PA 19355 | 610-648-7140 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
