On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:41:13PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:32:52AM -0600, Romer, Benjamin M wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 11:36 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:58:35PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote: > > > > From: Erik Arfvidson <erik.arfvid...@unisys.com> > > > > > > > > This patch changes serverdown variable to int instead of bool > > > > > > > > > > Why? It looks like bool is more appropriate? > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > We had received some comments on our code that said that our BOOL > > typedef wasn't acceptable, > > Because we already have the "bool" type.
I agree with Dan here. This is a bool type, so use it, only use int for returning error values in functions, not for variables that really are boolean values. Can you respin this series with that change? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
