On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:32:52AM -0600, Romer, Benjamin M wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 11:36 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:58:35PM -0500, Benjamin Romer wrote: > > > From: Erik Arfvidson <erik.arfvid...@unisys.com> > > > > > > This patch changes serverdown variable to int instead of bool > > > > > > > Why? It looks like bool is more appropriate? > > Hi Dan, > > We had received some comments on our code that said that our BOOL > typedef wasn't acceptable,
Because we already have the "bool" type. > and that we really ought to be returning 0 > for success and error values in failure cases. By switching these to int > we're taking a first step towards that. True, but I'm not sure if these patches help us do that generally, and especially here we're changed a struct member and not a return type... regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
