Hi!
On Jan 6, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Even for the client/connector?
> I'm curious, got a link where Brian explains why it's not efficient enough?
I toyed with this a couple of months back and was not that impressed with the
performance it offered. In part because this is one area where what you give up
in abstraction, is really what you need to make use of to get any good
performance (ie this is setsocket stuff).
On a different note, I would love to see a good C++ connector. A connector
relying on boost would be a negative in that it would be a dependency, on the
other hand? Not everyone would really care.
If I was to start writing one today, I'd write it in C++ and probably skip
boost. If someone was to write one and make use of boost? I am sure we would be
happy to ship it with the server.
Cheers,
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
