On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote: >> Even for the client/connector? >> I'm curious, got a link where Brian explains why it's not efficient enough? > > I toyed with this a couple of months back and was not that impressed with the > performance it offered. In part because this is one area where what you give > up in abstraction, is really what you need to make use of to get any good > performance (ie this is setsocket stuff).
What stuff are you missing? Did you talk with the author about it? AFAIK Asio is designed for high performance. > On a different note, I would love to see a good C++ connector. A connector > relying on boost would be a negative in that it would be a dependency, on the > other hand? Not everyone would really care. Do you mean a C++ interface? Talk was about a C++ implementation providing the normal C interface. > If I was to start writing one today, I'd write it in C++ and probably skip > boost. If someone was to write one and make use of boost? I am sure we would > be happy to ship it with the server. Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
