On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Olaf van der Spek <[email protected]> wrote: > Are security, code simplicity and good design reasons not good enough?
I'm not sure which alternative you are proposing now. If you just want to remove something, then no: we could always remove more code because every line of code is a potential source of a security bug, makes the thing more complex, etc. So in this case for instance I'd prefer LOAD DATA to stay, if the alternative is to remove it. If you are volunteering to write a replacement, and LOAD DATA will stay until you have that replacement, then I'm all ++ for it. Tried to give some helpful feedback too. > Why's that ideal? Due to performance? I think performance is good > enough when doing the parsing client-side. > If it's not, that performance should just be improved. Performance and simplicity for the end user. If you can deliver the same performance and prove it, then sure, remove unneeded code from the server. henrik -- [email protected] +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo www.openlife.cc My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559 _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
