On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Henrik Ingo <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding Shrews and others' comments: Good use cases you mention, > such as select into outfile doing joins. Bet drizzledump doesn't do > that! It seems to me the mysql client still comes close to doing this.
What about the drizzle client? > Personally I'm perhaps willing to accept piping through sed as a valid > solution. But beyond that, I also reject the argument "you can use > your favorite scripting language". This is a useful feature and it is > good to continue to support it. There's quite a difference between keeping the feature and keeping the server-side implementation. Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
