On Oct 20, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Henrik Ingo <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Regarding Shrews and others' comments: Good use cases you mention, >> such as select into outfile doing joins. Bet drizzledump doesn't do >> that! It seems to me the mysql client still comes close to doing this. > > What about the drizzle client? > >> Personally I'm perhaps willing to accept piping through sed as a valid >> solution. But beyond that, I also reject the argument "you can use >> your favorite scripting language". This is a useful feature and it is >> good to continue to support it. > > There's quite a difference between keeping the feature and keeping the > server-side implementation.
For what it's worth, here is the feature-request for adding support for the --tabs, etc. options to drizzledump: https://bugs.launchpad.net/drizzle/+bug/878829 _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
