Accidentally dropped the list: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Henrik Ingo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Olaf van der Spek <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:33 AM, agentzh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I wonder if the drizzle development team is willing to add back >>> support for building libdrizzle 1.0 separately and skip all those >>> weird dependency checks in the ./configure script. If yes, then it'll >>> be highly appreciated. >> >> I think building the client lib should be as simple as possible. >> Maybe we could have a separate build script for the client lib. > > I think this is a very reasonable request so I posted a bug about > this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/drizzle/+bug/898360 > After all, we make no secret about it that you can also use libdrizzle > with MySQL. > > It seems to me too that the simple solution here is to just maintain > some separate simple build script for building just libdrizzle. As it > is designed to be self contained, I hear it doesn't even depend on > boost, makes me wonder if it even needs autotools in the first place? > Could there just be a libdrizzle-1.0/Makefile and there you go? > > Anyway, Olaf, is this something in your territory, or do we need > autotools/pandora skills of Monty/Mark/Brian for it? Who should I > assign the bug to? > > henrik > -- > [email protected] > +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo > www.openlife.cc > > My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559
-- [email protected] +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo www.openlife.cc My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559 _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
