Is that true? Great news I have heard! I have some patches on libdrizzle-0.8, or it is time for me to redesign and redo it with 1.0, something about call procedures
-- Charles Chen Software Engineer Server Platforms Team at Taobao.com -----邮件原件----- 发件人: drizzle-discuss-bounces+crk_world=yahoo.com...@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:drizzle-discuss-bounces+crk_world=yahoo.com...@lists.launchpad.net] 代表 Brian Aker 发送时间: 2011年12月12日 8:28 收件人: agentzh 抄送: [email protected] 主题: Re: [Drizzle-discuss] drizzle no longer supports building libdrizzle 1.0 separately? Hi, We are working on releasing libdrizzle as a stand alone library alongside the release. IE you will be able to download libdrizzle as a separate project if you just want it. Right now we are working out a couple of kinks in the system, but I believe we will have this done shortly. Cheers, -Brian On Nov 28, 2011, at 1:33 AM, agentzh wrote: > Hi, folks! > > I'm one of the authors of the Nginx Drizzle module that makes Nginx > talk nonblockingly to MySQL/Drizzle backends via libdrizzle 1.0: > > http://wiki.nginx.org/HttpDrizzleModule > > Quite a few big companies here in China have been using this Nginx > module quite extensively in production for months already. And it > won't be possible without the excellent libdrizzle client. > > But recently, however, a lot of our users have been complaining about > the pains involved in building libdrizzle 1.0 with the recent releases > of Drizzle7 though. Older versions of drizzle7 released months ago did > support building libdrizzle 1.0 like this: > > ./configure --without-server > make libdrizzle-1.0 > make install-libdrizzle-1.0 > > But it no longer works in recent releases of drizzle7. And now it > seems to be required to build everything including the server, and > requiring all those dependencies like a very new version of boost and > protobuf that libdrizzle 1.0 does not need at all. In fact, most of > our users are only using libdrizzle 1.0 to connect to an official > MySQL server and do not want to bother building the drizzle server. > > We're really missing the good old time when libdrizzle is painless to > set up in a moderate production system. > > I wonder if the drizzle development team is willing to add back > support for building libdrizzle 1.0 separately and skip all those > weird dependency checks in the ./configure script. If yes, then it'll > be highly appreciated. > > Thank you for taking the time to read this mail and thank you all for > creating this wonderful library in the first place! > > Best regards, > -agentzh > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
