Ah, libdrizzle dev is in "all" architecture, so clearly having an .so there is a bug. I'll move it to libdrizzle1 with the other .so's.
henrik On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Henrik Ingo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Clint > > I'm refreshing our deb build scripts to work against newest release. > In the old version, we have this for libdrizzle: > > $ grep libdrizzle.so debian/* > debian/changelog: * Updated libdrizzle package based on new libdrizzle so > bump. > debian/libdrizzle1.install:usr/lib/libdrizzle.so.* > debian/libdrizzle1.symbols:libdrizzle.so.1 libdrizzle1 #MINVER# > debian/libdrizzle-dev.install:usr/lib/libdrizzle.so > debian/rules: dh_strip -Xlibdrizzle.so --dbg-package=drizzle-dbg > > > Why are (or rather were, since this will change) libdrizzle.so.1 and > libdrizzle.so.1.1.0 in libdrizzle1 but libdrizzle.so is only in > libdrizzle-dev? Shouldn't -dev be just header files? > > henrik > > > > -- > [email protected] > +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo > www.openlife.cc > > My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559 -- [email protected] +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo www.openlife.cc My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559 _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
