Le 18 févr. 2012 à 07:24, pcrews a écrit : > On 02/18/2012 07:13 AM, David Shrewsbury wrote: >> >> On Feb 17, 2012, at 8:41 PM, Daniel Nichter wrote: >> >> transaction_log - Should not be enabled by default. This is >> the file-based transaction log (not used by the slave) and >> is rather buggy, IMO. I almost feel like we should remove it >> from the tree... > > I'd be in favor of removing the transaction_log if nobody objects. I don't > think it's bad code, but we see significant gains from using the innodb-based > log / I'm not aware of anything that relies on this and suspect if anything > does, that it could be adapted to use the bad-ass innodb rpl log : ) > > Plus it is nice to trim out code / tests that aren't used but cause overhead.
I for removing it too. -Daniel _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
