Hi, Are the plugins being compiled right now?
We should add testing around the packages in Jenkins... (or,... more testing)
Cheers,
-Brian
On Feb 27, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:01 AM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 2012, at 4:13 AM, David Shrewsbury wrote:
>>> transaction_log - Should not be enabled by default. This is
>>> the file-based transaction log (not used by the slave) and
>>> is rather buggy, IMO. I almost feel like we should remove it
>>> from the tree...
>>
>> I tend to agree,....
>>
>> Unless someone else cares to do it, I can submit this patch.
>
> As your new all-round packager, I'm not supportive of removing this
> for 7.1 tree.
>
> I do support the idea if it is implemented in the future 7.2 tree.
>
> Removals like this disrupt the packaging process. Since we are in RC
> we should not consider such deletions anymore, otherwise things will
> never get stable. From my point of view it is easier to have the
> unused plugin hanging around for 7.1 and then delete it as soon as we
> open a 7.2 development branch.
>
> We missed the boat with 7.1, but once we get into 7.2 I hope we can
> merge the packaging branch into main tree finally. Then these kind of
> changes can be done with one patch that both deletes the code and
> makes necessary rpm .spec and debian/* changes, causing less side
> effects.
>
> henrik
> --
> [email protected]
> +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo
> www.openlife.cc
>
> My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
