On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Feb 15, 2012, at 2:02 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote: > >> I have not yet fully fixed the "make rpm" side (it will still package >> libdrizzle, other than that it works).
Just as an update: By now I have working RPM packaging for lp:drizzle, and it will not package libdrizzle in any way. Packages can be found here: http://download.drizzle.org/7.1/redhat/6/ > > Is your plan for libdrizzle to commit the spec to drizzle, or to libdrizzle? The plan would be to package libdrizzle rpm and deb files from lp:libdrizzle. Scripts and make commands to do that would not be present in lp:drizzle at all. (For one thing, then you can do "make rpm" in either place and don't need to come up with something like "make rpm-libdrizzle".) Note however that I'm currently putting less priority on this for libdrizzle. It can be assumed that our current libdrizzle users can and will build it from source, so I see it as much less critical than providing packages for drizzle-client and drizzle-server. For instance this lp:libdrizzle autoconf bug is imo much more important than rpm/deb, considering the target audience: https://bugs.launchpad.net/drizzle/+bug/939935 "libdrizzle does not build in CentOS 5" henrik -- [email protected] +358-40-8211286 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo www.openlife.cc My LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=9522559 _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
