Hi,
We're experimenting with adding new metadata schemas on DSpace. I come
from a computer science background, so I am thinking hierarchically,
like DNS and LDAP, where the hierarchies are essentially name spaces
with common at the top, moving to more unique at the bottom:
.
org.
example.
www.
OR
dc=org
dc=example
dc=www
Naturally, I want to create a schema in DSpace which look like this:
org.example.subject
org.example2.subject
My library guy prefers:
org.subject.example
org.subject.example2
Are there any technical reasons why we should use one over the other?
Cheers,
--
Alan Orth
alan.o...@gmail.com
http://alaninkenya.org
http://mjanja.co.ke
"I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my
wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone."
-Bjarne Stroustrup, inventor of C++
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
