Marcin Krol wrote, on 06. feb 2007 21:34: [...]
The problem is with not enough people present on each of those we could end up with limited amount of expertise spread thinly. E.g. so far nobody answered my question on explicit whitelisting in DSPAM. :-(
I and a couple of others answered something similar a while ago - can't keep on writing the same time after time (Though Nir does, to the Mozilla NGs); and did you search for "whitelist" in the dspam ML archive? Google says there are 225 references.
OK, if nobody here knows this particular corner of DSPAM, tough, I know it now - but with web-based forums, I'd have to post this question in several places and track each of those. Sure, that can be done, but it's our _time_ that is increasingly scarce resource. It's not that I wouldn't bother to expend the effort, it's just timing constraints are harder and harder on me.
What's wrong with the ML archive Google? Me, I prefer the stuff on my HD, but ...
--Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl
