That's similar to what I was thinking. If you have the spam delivered to a user's spam folder in their mailbox rather than put it in quarantine, I would think you could cluster them, although I haven't done it, so take my advice with a grain of salt.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:14:07 +0100, Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Todd S. Florman wrote, on 21. feb 2007 23:11: > > [...] > >> I completely forgot about the mbox/nfs situation, but you are most >> certainly correct. Does anyone happen to have any innovative ideas >> about per user quarantines in a clustered sort of setup, or am I stuck >> using client/server mode with libdspam processing only occurring on a >> single server. >> >> If anyone is running dspam across multiple servers, I would be >> interested in knowing what you did or concessions you had to make to get >> a working setup. > > We don't run our dspam (or IMAP) setup on shared servers, but we do run > an alternative IMAP quarantine setup to dspam's native CGI that would be > suitable for NFS, just as IMAP is suitable for NFS *if* run on a > dependable backend such as Netgear or NFS 4 (this last has been > discussed often on the Courier IMAP mailing list). > > Users drag 'n drop (Evolution, Thunderbird, Outlook[Express]) or move > (SquirrelMail) misjudged messages to a "misjudged" folder and a cron job > reclassifies the messages every hour and moves the reclassified message > to an appropriate folder (INBOX or INBOX.Spam). The cron job also > mangles the dspam header so that the message can't be submitted a second > time. > > This is not an answer to your original question, it is an alternative > way of doing things ;) > > --Tonni > > -- > Tony Earnshaw > Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl > > !DSPAM:45dd09f039241317666847!
