Frank Tiemann wrote:
Good Morning,
I completely forgot about the mbox/nfs situation, but you are most
certainly correct. Does anyone happen to have any innovative ideas
about per user quarantines in a clustered sort of setup, or am I stuck
using client/server mode with libdspam processing only occurring on a
single server.
If anyone is running dspam across multiple servers, I would be
interested in knowing what you did or concessions you had to make to
get a working setup.
Todd
!DSPAM:1,45dcc42e264033883910179!
just an idea: dont use the "regular" quarantine-feature of dspam. just
tag the quarantined mails as "spam" (or dont do that) and use the
x-header (or the spam-tag in subject) on your mta after reinjecting to
deliver to a maildir on nfs.
greets
KHP
Thanks for the responses...
I too have pondered the many possibilities where quarantining is
concerned. My biggest issue with this approach is that there isn't an
easy way to make the web interface deliver the quarantined mail unless
its using it's own mechanism of mbox. The web interface is one of the
biggest reasons I like Dspam. Granted, the interface is limited, but
for what it does... it does pretty well ie. displaying stats, retraining
classification mistakes, and delivering falsely quarantined messages.
If there were an option for maildir instead of mbox quarantining, this
wouldn't be an issue, but until someone who is capable hacks out the
code, I am stuck.
What puzzles me is how there are some supposedly rather large installs
out there, but no one has coded this in such a way to facilitate a more
clustered setup. The database code (for mysql at least) can handle it,
but the quarantining subsystem is pretty rudimentary.
Todd
