Hello all, OK, I've patched the port (it's V3.8.0) and recompiled and reinstalled. I will check the following:
groupname1:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] groupname2:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] groupname3:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] And let you know how it comes out. Thanks for the help!! Noor On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:24:31 +0200, "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:06:41 -0300 >> Von: "Ricardo J. Barberis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> An: [email protected] >> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Per-domain merged group > >> El Jueves 12 Junio 2008, Steve escribió: >> > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> > > Hello folks. >> > > >> > > I am in the process of building a platform for a local SMB that >> > > wants to give professional services to its customers. The services >> > > include anti-spam, anti-virus and webmail capabilities. It also >> > > includes notifications sent via E-mail about junk kept in > quarantine. >> > > >> > > >> > > I've already managed to find solutions for most of the requests, > but >> > > one thing I am still stuck with: To build per-domain merged groups.. > I >> > > am using the following: >> > > >> > > FreeBSD 7 >> > > MySQL 5.1 (latest, from ports) >> > > Postfix (current, from ports, with virtual domains in MySQL) >> > > DSPAM (from ports) >> > > Postgrey (from ports) >> > > Apache 2.2 (from ports) >> > > >> > > I'm using DSPAM as a Postfix content_filter (in master.cf), and >> > > another port for re-injection. >> > > >> > > Your help on how to build per-domain merged groups would be much >> > > appreciated. >> > >> > Assuming your DSPAM users have the domain name in their DSPAM user > name, >> > then you could try something like that: > groupname1:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > groupname2:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > groupname3:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Note, unless you're using dspam from a recent CVS, >> > Or you use DSPAM on Gentoo, because the currently available ebuild > (dspam-3.8.0-r11) has already the code included. > > >> you'll need a patch to >> add >> that functionallity. >> >> Attached is a patch to version 3.8.0 (patch later included in the CVS) > but >> please see my other emails about segfaults before aplying as it may be >> related to this patch. >> > What other mails? Have you a reference? > > >> Regards, >> -- >> Ricardo J. Barberis >> Senior SysAdmin - I+D >> Dattatec.com :: Soluciones de Web Hosting >> Su Hosting hecho Simple..! >> >> >> > > !DSPAM:1011,48564ead150921112213191!
