Ohhh, now this make me so happy to know that it's working! :) I once invested days trying to make this work (including using this same configuration), but didn't know why it wasn't working.. Now I get it, it was the little patch.
Thanks all for the help. S.t. On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:29:44 +0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > OK, I've patched the port (it's V3.8.0) and recompiled and reinstalled. > I will check the following: > > groupname1:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > groupname2:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > groupname3:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > And let you know how it comes out. > > Thanks for the help!! > > Noor > > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:24:31 +0200, "Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >>> Datum: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:06:41 -0300 >>> Von: "Ricardo J. Barberis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> An: [email protected] >>> Betreff: Re: [dspam-users] Per-domain merged group >> >>> El Jueves 12 Junio 2008, Steve escribió: >>> > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >>> > > Hello folks. >>> > > >>> > > I am in the process of building a platform for a local SMB that >>> > > wants to give professional services to its customers. The services >>> > > include anti-spam, anti-virus and webmail capabilities. It also >>> > > includes notifications sent via E-mail about junk kept in >> quarantine. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > I've already managed to find solutions for most of the requests, >> but >>> > > one thing I am still stuck with: To build per-domain merged > groups.. >> I >>> > > am using the following: >>> > > >>> > > FreeBSD 7 >>> > > MySQL 5.1 (latest, from ports) >>> > > Postfix (current, from ports, with virtual domains in MySQL) >>> > > DSPAM (from ports) >>> > > Postgrey (from ports) >>> > > Apache 2.2 (from ports) >>> > > >>> > > I'm using DSPAM as a Postfix content_filter (in master.cf), and >>> > > another port for re-injection. >>> > > >>> > > Your help on how to build per-domain merged groups would be much >>> > > appreciated. >>> > >>> > Assuming your DSPAM users have the domain name in their DSPAM user >> name, >>> > then you could try something like that: >> groupname1:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > groupname2:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > groupname3:merged:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> Note, unless you're using dspam from a recent CVS, >>> >> Or you use DSPAM on Gentoo, because the currently available ebuild >> (dspam-3.8.0-r11) has already the code included. >> >> >>> you'll need a patch to >>> add >>> that functionallity. >>> >>> Attached is a patch to version 3.8.0 (patch later included in the CVS) >> but >>> please see my other emails about segfaults before aplying as it may be >>> related to this patch. >>> >> What other mails? Have you a reference? >> >> >>> Regards, >>> !DSPAM:1011,485653ba150929321733806!
