Ed, Some of the things in your latest post are patently false, but you're now down to making personal attacks and assumptions about me that mean it's time to end the conversation. You're obviously not ready to have an adult conversation about the real issues at hand. You can't stick to the topics I brought up, and ignored most of them in your reply.
Your original posting you said was "tongue-in-cheek" had no emoticons or other indications that it was a joke, and you were saying that people just shouldn't callsign route and only use D-Plus links. I don't think you were joking at all. I replied saying that was silly, and that started this whole thing. You wouldn't be so defensive about it if you were really kidding. You're continuing to vigorously defend D-Plus' built in problems and won't admit it has just as many problems as callsign routing... so what's the point? You're obviously not going to be swayed by facts. You said multiple country/repeater conversations aren't possible with callsign routing -- False. You said you can't reply to someone callsign routing to your repeater to tell them the repeater's busy without programming in callsigns -- also False. You said that dropouts of transmissions doesn't bother you and then went on to discuss changes that Robin has made, when there's been no code changes to D-Plus on the Gateways for months -- also False or made up. Generally, you're just not ready for this discussion, yet. You're not willing to stick to the technical pros/cons of both systems, so I'm ending this. So if there's no reality/truth in the conversation, why have it at all? I think we both agree that both systems have pros/cons, but you've got some pink sunglasses on there when you look at D-Plus, and you take them off when you look at callsign routing. Nate WY0X
