> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Dundi] DUNDi popularity > > > >>>>> "Jim" == Jim Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jim> Like other folks on this list we are scratching our heads > Jim> wondering why DUNDi is not more popular. Testimonials indicate > Jim> that DUNDi is useful for enterprise (private) networks, but we > Jim> have not heard of success for DUNDi in public networks. > > Because DUNDi does not solve the simple problem of who is > authoritative for which numbers. > > If you and I join our mutual networks, then I can claim to > *you* that I am the right destination for any number on the > planet. That means that I can hijack any call of yours that I want. > That means I can record it, misdirect it, etc. >
This is an excellent point. If this shortcoming were solved, would DUNDi make sense for a public network? _______________________________________________ Dundi mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
