Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Christian Ohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Committing from the diff buffer has questionable utility since you >> can just as easily use the status buffer to commit. And it creates >> the problems I described. It's a good candidate for removal. > > I'd like to have the feedback of other DVC users and developers, but > to me, the "diff/edit-log/commit" cycle *is* the most meaningfull. So, > you're indeed proposing to remove what is the most usefull thing to me > in DVC.
I always commit straight from the log-edit buffer. Unless there are
only a subset of files that I wish to commit, in which case I do it by
hand. I suppose I ought to learn how to narrow the subset via dired or
the status buffer someday.
--
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 |
http://mwolson.org/ -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net | /` |\ | | |
Sysadmin -- Hobbies: Lisp, GP2X, HCoop | |_] | \| |_|
Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner |
pgps1YynCz9WU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
