>>>>> "stefan" == Stefan Reichör <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
stefan> Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Christian Ohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Committing from the diff buffer has questionable utility since you
>>>> can just as easily use the status buffer to commit. And it creates
>>>> the problems I described. It's a good candidate for removal.
>>>
>>> I'd like to have the feedback of other DVC users and developers, but
>>> to me, the "diff/edit-log/commit" cycle *is* the most meaningfull. So,
>>> you're indeed proposing to remove what is the most usefull thing to me
>>> in DVC.
stefan> I use the same cycle:
stefan> M-x dvc-diff
stefan> M-x dvc-log-edit
stefan> M-x dvc-log-edit-done
>> I always commit straight from the log-edit buffer. Unless there are
>> only a subset of files that I wish to commit, in which case I do it by
>> hand. I suppose I ought to learn how to narrow the subset via dired or
>> the status buffer someday.
stefan> You can narrow down this list easily by marking the
stefan> relevant files in the diff buffer.
Yup. Exactly my workflow. But selective commits account for
around 10%.
>From time to time I use dvc-status to check unknown files and add
the relevant ones from there, then back to
diff/log-edit/log-edit-done.
I discovered 'j' in dvc-diff-mode quite recently, have been
living without it before.
Vincent
_______________________________________________
Dvc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
