Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Stephen Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Alphabetizing should be done in the Emacs Lisp code instead, and it can > respect rename boundaries. git alphabetizes also, but keeps files with > a particular kind of change (i.e. modified, added, deleted, unmodified) > grouped, and keeps renames together.
bzr does something similar. I'm used to the pcvs display, which is grouped by directory, and otherwise alphabetically. The mtn dvc display is the same, without the directory labels. I don't see any particular advantage to grouping by kind of change. One disadvantage is it means files can be shown twice; renamed and modified. That makes some dvc code more complicated, and means you have to think about the same file twice. What do you see as the advantage? -- -- Stephe _______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
