Stephen Leake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm used to the pcvs display, which is grouped by directory, and > otherwise alphabetically. The mtn dvc display is the same, without the > directory labels. > > I don't see any particular advantage to grouping by kind of change.
I guess it's a matter of aesthetics. > One disadvantage is it means files can be shown twice; renamed and > modified. That makes some dvc code more complicated, and means you > have to think about the same file twice. > > What do you see as the advantage? The file is both changed and moved. To show it as only moved would be hiding information. -- | Michael Olson | FSF Associate Member #652 | | http://mwolson.org/ | Hobbies: Lisp, HCoop | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, ErBot, DVC, Planner | `-------------------------------------------------------'
pgpvr0ppZR4Ec.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dvc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/dvc-dev
