On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Reimar Döffinger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:22:26AM -0800, Erik Hovland wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Reimar Döffinger >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 10:43:14AM -0800, Erik Hovland wrote: >> >> Also dealt w/ in the commit in November '11 in my github tree: >> >> https://github.com/microe/libdvdnav >> > >> > What's the point in hoarding such trivial patches for almost a >> > year in a repository nobody knows about (it sure isn't on the homepage)? >> > I see that larger patches might needs some testing or longer work on >> > them, but that is hardly what I'd consider a good use of >> > private/development repositories. >> >> There is no point in hoarding. The only reason most of these >> patches have not been committed is b/c of general laziness on >> my part. >> >> I still consider mplayerhq svn to be the canonical place for all libdvdread >> and libdvdnav development. So I *pinky-swear* promise to get my tree >> pushed into that repository as fast as I can. >> >> Is it too difficult to try my tree in the meantime? > > Fairly, the thing I am "trying" is fixing MPlayer's Coverity scan results, > integrating your tree is a bit annoying though if you're really > interested I can give it a try.
Ah, this makes sense. There are a lot of commits to my repo that address several coverity defects. Is there a way to get access to the MPlayer scan results? E -- Erik Hovland [email protected] http://hovland.org/ _______________________________________________ DVDnav-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
